SAML vs. OpenID Connect: Which SSO Protocol Should You Support?
A practical comparison of SAML 2.0 and OpenID Connect for enterprise SSO — when to use each, and why you probably need both.
When an enterprise customer asks you to "support SSO," they usually mean one of two things: SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect (OIDC). Both accomplish the same goal — letting users authenticate with their company's identity provider — but they work very differently. Here's how to choose.
SAML 2.0: The Enterprise Standard
SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) has been the enterprise SSO standard since the mid-2000s. It uses XML-based assertions to communicate authentication state between an identity provider (IdP) and a service provider (SP).
Strengths:
- Universal enterprise support — every major IdP speaks SAML (Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin, PingFederate)
- Mature and battle-tested over 20 years
- Rich attribute mapping for passing user data
- Well-understood by enterprise IT teams
Weaknesses:
- XML-heavy — verbose and complex to parse
- No built-in token format — you get assertions, not JWTs
- Session management is awkward (single logout is notoriously fragile)
- Mobile/SPA support is poor
Best for: Enterprise customers with existing SAML-based IdPs, compliance requirements that mandate SAML, and B2B integrations with large organizations.
OpenID Connect: The Modern Choice
OIDC is an identity layer built on top of OAuth 2.0. It uses JSON-based tokens (JWTs) and RESTful endpoints, making it a natural fit for modern web and mobile applications.
Strengths:
- Simple, clean protocol design
- JWT-based tokens are easy to validate and introspect
- Built-in discovery (.well-known/openid-configuration)
- First-class mobile and SPA support
- Dynamic client registration
Weaknesses:
- Less mature in enterprise environments (though adoption is rapidly growing)
- Some legacy IdPs don't support OIDC
- Token validation requires understanding of JWT security
Best for: Modern applications, mobile apps, SPAs, developer tools, and organizations using cloud-native identity providers.
The Answer: Support Both
In practice, you'll need both protocols. Your enterprise customers in regulated industries will require SAML. Your developer-focused customers and internal tools will prefer OIDC. And many identity providers (Google Workspace, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta) support both.
Calimatic Identity supports both protocols natively:
- SAML 2.0 Service Provider — Configure SAML SSO connections in the admin panel with metadata URL import, attribute mapping, and certificate management.
- OIDC Relying Party — Connect to any OIDC-compliant IdP with automatic discovery and configuration.
- Pre-built Connectors — Google Workspace and Microsoft Entra ID work with a few clicks.
- LDAP Directory Sync — For organizations that haven't adopted federated SSO yet.
The best part? From your application's perspective, it doesn't matter which protocol the user authenticated with. Calimatic Identity normalizes the experience — your app always gets a consistent session with the same user attributes regardless of the upstream protocol.
Getting Started
Setting up SSO in Calimatic Identity takes minutes:
- Navigate to the SSO page in the admin panel
- Create a new connection (SAML or OIDC)
- Enter the IdP metadata URL or configure manually
- Map attributes (we auto-detect common mappings)
- Test the connection with a single click
Check our documentation for step-by-step guides for each supported identity provider.